Disposed
Divyalok Associates and another v. Bank of Baroda (Vijaya Bank)
DRATMISC APPEAL/8/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I.A. No. 173/2021 In Misc. Appeal No. 08/2022 Date: 14.07.2022
Divyalok Associates and Anr. Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri Sanjay Kumar Gupta, counsel for the appellants, Shri Satyajit Mukherji, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
The record shows that respondent-Bank has filed reply and rejoinder to the same has also been filed by the appellant. The Tracking report shows that respondent no. 3 has been noticed, but no reply has been filed on behalf of the said respondent. There is no authentication that the respondent no. 4 has been noticed. Let fresh steps be taken by the counsel for the appellant for service of notice upon the respondent no. 4 within a week by two modes i.e. registered post with A.D. and speed Post. Affidavit along with tracking report be filed by the next date.
List this case on 20.09.2022 for service. Till then the interim order, if any, shall continue.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Divyalok Associates and Anr.
Bank of Baroda
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court