The Registrar of the Delhi Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal listed the matter for removal of objections regarding the necessity of pre-deposit and unstamped Vakalatnama. The hearing was conducted via video conferencing with no order passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI Misc. Appeal No.171/2022 Arising out of O.A.No.1442/2019 (DRT, Jaipur)
Bell Finvest India Ltd. Vs
Au Small Finance Bank Ltd.
21.09.2022
Present: Mr. Ravi Data, counsel for the appellant.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Counsel for appellant submits that he has filed an appeal against the original application as such pre-deposit is not required. Vakalatnama is unstamped.
List the matter on 22.09.2022 for removal of objections.
(Rajmani Sinha) Registrar
sandesh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether pre-deposit is required in an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
Whether the vacancy of the Vakalatnama stamp is a curable defect.
Bell Finvest India Ltd.
Au Small Finance Bank Ltd.
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
