Shantanu Shandilya v. Bank of Baroda and Anr.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 690/2021
(Shantanu Shandilya Vs. Bank of Baroda)
Date: 21.09.2022
BH of Shri G.K. Srivastava, Ld. Counsel files Vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent-Bank
Ms. Ishika Arora, Advocate, holding brief of Shri Sandeep Arora, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present and submits D.D. No. 119661 dated 20.09.2022 (BOB) for Rs. 28,505/- (Rs. Twenty Eight Thousand Five Hundred Five only) towards deficient court fee.
No pre deposit has been made. Waiver Application has been filed. In the Waiver Application it has been stated that property sold by Bank. Ld. Counsel states that he will argue this point before Hon’ble Court.
The instant Appeal has been filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against final order dated 30.08.2022 of DRT, Lucknow in S.A. No. 505/2016. Waiver Application (I.A. No. 390/2022) Urgency Application (I.A. No. 389/2022) Interim Relief Application (I.A. No. 391/2022) have been filed.
List this case before Hon’ble Court on 29.09.2022 for admission.
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shantanu Shandilya
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 091090006902022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court