shown by this Tribunal, and no further concession be granted to the Appellants. It is submitted that the amounts in the name of the Appellants lying in fixed deposits with the Respondent Bank could be adjusted towards the amount due from the Appellants as the Respondent Bank has a lien over those deposits and there is no embargo in appropriating those amounts. At the date of filing the appeal, a sum of ₹ 7,75,64,475.67 was due from the Appellants to the Respondent Bank and this Tribunal had determined a sum of ₹2.5 Crores to be paid as pre-deposit. ₹ 57 Lakhs, which was lying in a deposit without lien with the Respondent Bank was also directed to be brought to the Tribunal towards pre-deposit to be paid by the Appellants. The Respondent Bank has already complied with that order and brought the sum of ₹ 57 Lakhs before this Court. Nothing is mentioned by the Appellants at the time of hearing the application for waiver or the application for extension of time filed as I.A. No. 302/2022 about adjusting the fixed deposits lying with the Respondent Bank towards pre-deposit. The Appellants had asked for eight weeks' time, and this Tribunal was pleased to grant them four weeks' time to pay the 2nd tranche of the pre-deposit. In the meanwhile, the Special Civil Application filed by the Appellants before the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat challenging the order of this Tribunal in I.A. No. 40 of 2022, was also disposed of without interfering with the order of this Tribunal. The Appellants cannot, therefore, seek any further indulgence from this Tribunal. Even if, the amounts in fixed deposits are to be adjusted towards the amount due, it would only bring down the total sum of ₹ 77,564,475.67, and cannot be adjusted towards the
