Appellants sought refund of pre-deposit made before the Tribunal under Section 21 of the RDDB Act. Since the appeal was treated as closed by the High Court, the Tribunal allowed the application and directed the Registrar to issue a demand draft along with accrued interest.
Refund of pre-deposit amount and accrued interest via demand draft.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson M.A. No. 34/2022 (Refund of Pre-deposit)
In
(Appeal No. 92/2019 – Disposed of)
Between
M/s. Mitexco & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Canara Bank … Respondent/s
Ms. Sonali Jain, Advocate for the Appellants.
Ms. Vaishali R. Bhilare, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
-: Order dated: 04/08/2022:-
1
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-9
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to a refund of the pre-deposit after the pending appeal was treated as closed by the High Court?
Whether the Tribunal is directed to issue a demand draft for the refunded amount along with accrued interest?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Mitexco & Ors.
Canara Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
