Salem Rafiq Sarang v. India Resurgence Arc Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The tribunal granted an extension of time to explore settlement. No substantive decision was made on the merits of the appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 34/2022
Between
Salem Rafiq Sarang … Appellant/s V/s. India Resurgence ARC Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr. Sahim Ansari, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Nikhil Rajani, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 03/08/2022:-
Further time is sought by the learned counsel for the parties to explore the possibility of a settlement.
Time is granted.
The parties are directed to get ready for a hearing, positively, on the next date if there is no possibility of a settlement.
Post on 15.09.2022 for reporting settlement/hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Salem Rafiq Sarang
- respondent
India Resurgence ARC Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court