Manish Singh v. Uco Bank and 2 Ors.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 58/2020 Date: 18.07.2022
Manish Singh Vs. UCO Bank and Ors.
Present: Shri Raj Kumar Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Shri Bharat Kant, counsel for the appellant, Shri Himanshu Tiwari, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Kushal Kant, counsel for the respondent no. 2,
The office report dated 15.07.2022 shows that reply to the waiver application as well as memo of appeal has been filed on behalf of the respondent-Bank and no reply has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2 inspite of two opportunities being granted.
So far as the service of notice upon respondent no. 3 is concerned, the same is not complete. Let the appellant take fresh steps for service of notice upon the respondent no. 3 through publication in the newspapers having wide circulation in the area. Steps to be taken within 15 days. Affidavit of service along with proof of publication be filed by the next date.
The respondent no. 2 may file reply by the next date, if so desired.
List this case on 23.09.2022 for service.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Manish Singh
- respondent
UCO Bank
- respondent
Respondent no. 2
- respondent
Respondent no. 3
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court