Hari Krishna gupta v. Punjab National Bank and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Listing order. The court adjourned the hearing to allow the respondent's counsel to appear before a rejoinder is filed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 99/2021 Date: 29.03.2022
Hari Krishna Gupta Vs. Punjab National Bank and Anr.
Present: Shri S. K. Gupta, counsel for the appellant, Shri M. K. Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Shri S. K. Srivastava, counsel for the respondents-Bank,
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the arguing counsel Shri S. K. Srivastava is unwell today, therefore, he is unable to appear.
List this case on 22.04.2022 for rejoinder.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Hari Krishna Gupta
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
Anr.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 091090000992021
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court