The Single Judge dismissed the appeal as infructuous as the appellant submitted that the loan account had already been settled, with no respondent present to oppose the submission.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 220/2019 Date: 12.04.2022
S.N.G. Developers Ltd. Vs. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. and Ors.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondents,
Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate files his vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant, who submits that the loan account has already been settled, therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous. Hence, the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
No one is present on behalf of the respondents to controvert the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant.
In view of the submission made by the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. In case the respondents have any objection, they may file appropriate application for recalling of the order passed today.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
S.N.G. Developers Ltd.
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
