Aman Khetrapal v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Direction to remove defects pointed out by the registry as this case was listed for removal of defects before appearing in court today. Next hearing fixed.
What did the court decide?
Appellant directed to remove defects pointed by registry before next hearing fixed for 30.01.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 1077/2022 Date: 07.12.2022
Aman Khetrapal Vs. Union Bank of India Present: Shri S. K. Pandey, counsel for the appellant,
Shri Sandeep Arora, Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent-Bank and submits that he has been served with the copy of memo today, therefore, he needs three days’ time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
It appears that this case was directed to be taken up today on the basis of a mention made by the learned counsel for the appellant before this Tribunal, but the fact that the said case was already listed before the Registrar for removal of defects on 07.12.2022, therefore, the counsel for the appellant is directed to remove the defects as pointed out by the registry before the Registrar on the date fixed.
List this case on 30.01.2023.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is required to remove defects pointed out by the registry before being allowed to argue the appeal on merits.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aman Khetrapal
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Justice R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 091090010772022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court