Aman Khetrapal v. Union Bank of India
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dy. No. 1077/2022
(Aman Khetripal Vs. Union Bank of India)
Date: 13.12.2022
B.H. of Shri S.K. Pandey, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is present and files Dates and Events. Copy already served to Caveator. Certified copy of the impugned order has already been filed. Fee detail mention in para 10. Pin Code mentioned. Paragraph No. corrected. Date mentioned in the I.A.. As regard illegible page No. 231 and 232, Ld. Counsel undertakes to file the legible/typed copy if desired by the Court. Defects reconciled.
No pre deposit has been made. It has been stated in the affidavit accompanying the Waiver Application that the appellant are neither borrower nor guarantor but tenant. Hence, condition of pre-deposit is not applicable. However, it is observed that the Notice under section 13 (2) dated 05.04.2021 was issued to M/s Greenland Motors through its partners and bears the name of Shri Sunil Khetrapal as Partner (page No. 160 of the instant appeal) the appellant no. 1 and 3 are sons and appellant no. 2 is wife of Shri Sunil Khetrapal.
The instant Appeal has been filed under section 18 of the SARFAESI Act against interim order dated 03.12.2022 of DRT, Allahabad in S.A. No. 600/2021. Urgency Application (I.A. No. 661/2022), Waiver Application (I.A. No. 660/2022) and Stay Application (I.A. No. 659/2022), have been filed.
Mentioned has been allowed by Hon’ble Chairperson.
List this case before Hon’ble Chairperson on 14.12. 2022 for admission.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aman Khetripal
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Chairperson
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 091090010772022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court