HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No.…
The impugned FIR has to be quashed with observations that the matter is dependent upon further proceedings in pending cases between the parties. All rights and contentions are left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~40
CNR No. DLHC010114572025
SH. AJEET KUMAR MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat and Mr. Samarth Lakra, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC with Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Ms. Priya Rai, Ms. Shristi Kumar, Mr. Purvit Jain, Ms. Katyayani Dwivedi and Ms. Anushka Mishra, Advs. for State. SI R.P Meena, PS: Palam Village.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 15.09.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 15, 2026/P
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 12:12:55
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned FIR should be quashed in light of the stay on the Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajeet Kumar Mishra
State NCT of Delhi
Pursuhashandra Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
