The petitioners sought disposal of the proceedings on the basis that the respondent-company had changed its corporate name and that no cause of action therefore remained. The High Court accepted the submission and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
CNR No. DLHC010192422024
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rohit Pradhan and Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advs. (Through VC)
versus
LAURENSUN REMEDIES P LTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rishub Kapoor, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R
% 17.09.2026
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
SEPTEMBER 17, 2026/KR
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2026 at 10:48:41
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any cause of action subsists after the respondent-company changed its corporate name.
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd & Anr.
Laurensun Remedies P Ltd
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
