Disposed

Shri Sanjay Kumar v. Dr. Ashish Chandra Verma Secretary (Revenue )/Divisional Commissioner

Delhi HC9 Sept 2026CONT.CAS(C)/1873/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of a previous order dated 20th February, 2024, which directed the respondent authorities to expeditiously dispose of a complaint regarding a disputed caste certificate. The Respondent's representative submitted an order dated 30th June, 2025, from the Sub-Divisional Magistrate indicating the complaint had been considered and disposed of, with the report forwarded to the State Standing Committee. The Court accepted this report as on record and disposed of the present petition, finding no further orders required.

What the court decided

AI extract

Shri Sanjay Kumar Vs Dr. Ashish Chandra Verma Secretary… — Caste Atrocities | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~21

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CNR No. DLHC010850202024

¶4

- CONT.CAS(C) 1873/2024

¶5

SHRI SANJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner

¶6

Through: None.

¶7

versus DR. ASHISH CHANDRA VERMA SECRETARY (REVENUE) /DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil), GNCTD with Mr. SS Parihar, DM, Central North and Mr. Pawan Kumar. (M): 9910623535 Email: [email protected]

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶9

O R D E R % 09.09.2026

¶10

The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 20^th February, 2024 passed by this Court in W.P. (C) 2188/2024 . 2. Vide the aforesaid order, directions were passed by this Court in the following manner:

¶11

“1. The Petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the Respondents to dispose of the complaint dated 12.06.2023 given by the Petitioner challenging the Caste Certificate issued in favour of Shri Pawan Kumar on the ground that Shri Pawan Kumar has got a false certificate.

¶12

2. Learned ASC appearing for the Respondents states a show cause notice has already been issued to Shri Pawan Kumar and he has already appeared three times and the matter is under

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2026 at 11:27:43

¶15

consideration. The statement is taken on record.

¶16

3. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondents to dispose of the complaint as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from today.

¶17

4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 5. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to approach this Court again in case enquiry is not completed within six months.”

¶18

Perusal of the said order shows that the aforesaid writ petition had been disposed of directing the respondents to take up the complaint of the petitioner expeditiously and dispose of the same.

¶19

Today, Mr. S.S. Parihar, District Magistrate, Central North, Government of NCT of Delhi (“GNCTD”), is present in Court and has handed over to this Court, an order dated 30^th June, 2025. He submits that the complaint of the petitioner has been considered and had been disposed of vide the said order.

¶20

The order dated 30^th June, 2025, passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (“SDM”), Model Town, Delhi is taken on record.

¶21

Mr. S.S. Parihar further submits that the said report shall be placed before the State Standing Committee for taking requisite decision.

¶22

The aforesaid statement is taken note of.

¶23

Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition.

¶24

The present petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶25

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶26

SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 c

¶27

Page 2 of 2

¶28

Shri Sanjay Kumar v. Dr. Ashish Chandra Verma Secretary (Revenue )/Divisional Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Shri Sanjay Kumar v. Dr. Ashish Chandra Verma Secretary (Revenue )/Divisional Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nirmal Tower Building Occupants Welfare Society (Regd) Vs Sumit Gakhar & Anr.

Shri Raj Kumar Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Jaya Ramraj Upadhyay Balika Mahavidyalaya Vs Ms. Sukhgeet Kaur, Iofs, Member Secretary, Ncte and Anr.

Naval Kumar Rai Vs Sh Gyanesh Bharti and Anr.

Raj Kumari Vs R. Mohanraja & Anr.

Rwa E Block Preet Vihar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi through Its Commissioner & Anr.

Smt Zarmaben Shankarbhai Patel College Vs Ms Rashmi Shukla Regional Director Western Regional Committee Ncte and Anr.

Kunwarpal & Ors. Vs Rbl Bank Limited & Anr.