Disposed

Jaya Ramraj Upadhyay Balika Mahavidyalaya v. Ms. Sukhgeet Kaur, Iofs, Member Secretary, Ncte and Anr.

Delhi HC7 Sept 2026CONT.CAS(C)/1621/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to submit documents required by the respondents for considering an application for change of name within one week. The respondents must also decide the petition within one week of receiving such documents. The petition was disposed of with these directions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to submit required documents within one week; respondents to decide the application within one week of receipt.

Jaya Ramraj Upadhyay Balika Mahavidyalaya Vs Ms… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~136

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision: 07^th September, 2026

¶4

CNR No. DLHC010419922026

¶5

- CONT.CAS(C) 1621/2026 & CM APPL. 60214/2026

¶6

JAYA RAMRAJ UPADHYAY BALIKA MAHAVIDYALAYA

¶7

.....Petitioner

¶8

Through: Mr. Akhilesh K. Srivastava, Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Ms. Archana Joshi and Mr. Sumit Malik, Advocates Mob: 7838681565 Email: [email protected]

¶9

versus

¶10

MS. SUKHGEET KAUR, IOFS, MEMBER SECRETARY, NCTE AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal and Ms. Tripta Sharma, Advocates Mob: 9811316090

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶12

MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (Oral):

¶13

The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 3^rd July, 2026, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 8630/2026 , wherein, directions were given in the following manner:

¶14

“xxx xxx xxx

¶15

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Da te:1 0.09.2026 23:22:19

¶16

”

¶17

In response to the present petition, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has handed over certain documents to this Court, which are taken on record.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has placed reliance on the First Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, (“NCTE Act”) issued by the Regional Director National Council for Teacher Education (“NCTE”) on 31^st August, 2026 to submit that meeting of the respondent took place on 22^nd and 23^rd July, 2026, wherein, upon examination of the documents available on record, the respondents were of the considered opinion that there are certain documents which are required to be furnished by the petitioner for change of the name.

¶19

He has handed over the list of the documents, which are required to be submitted by the petitioner.

¶20

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Da te:1 0.09.2026 23:22:19

¶21

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the said documents shall be deposited with the respondent, within a period of one week, from today.

¶22

Accordingly, it is directed as follows:

¶23

I. The documents as required by the respondents for the purposes of considering the application of the petitioner for change of name, shall be submitted by the petitioner with the respondents, within a period of one week from today.

¶24

II. Upon receipt of the said documents, the respondents shall decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of one week, from the receipt of the documents.

¶25

III. In case the aforesaid timeline is breached by the respondents, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive the present petition.

¶26

Accordingly, with the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of.

¶27

Pending application also stands disposed of.

¶28

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶29

SEPTEMBER 7, 2026 ak

¶30

Signature Not Verified

¶31

Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Da te:1 0.09.2026 23:22:19

Jaya Ramraj Upadhyay Balika Mahavidyalaya v. Ms. Sukhgeet Kaur, Iofs, Member Secretary, Ncte and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaya Ramraj Upadhyay Balika Mahavidyalaya v. Ms. Sukhgeet Kaur, Iofs, Member Secretary, Ncte and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadruddin Vs Qutabidin & Ors.

Green Estate and Hre Plot Holders Association & Ors. Vs Sh Sabina Avasthy, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Hq Central & Anr.

Inder Jit Dua Vs Mr Sanjeev Ahuja Abd Ors.

Muslim Committee Chattarpur Village & Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Kshitij Malik Vs Shri Mugilrajan D & Ors.

Shri Sanjay Kumar Vs Dr. Ashish Chandra Verma Secretary (Revenue )/Divisional Commissioner

Kunwarpal & Ors. Vs Rbl Bank Limited & Anr.

Rahul Nath Vs Abhishek Ranjan (Ceo) Bses Rajdhani Power Limited