Disposed
Raj Kumari v. R. Mohanraja & Anr.
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/1659/2026
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
$~96 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~96
CNR No. DLHC010429142026
RAJ KUMARI .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Monica Kapoor, Advocate with petitioner in person. (M): 9810099066 Email: [email protected]
versus
R. MOHANRAJA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, CGSC with Ms. Katyayini Joshi, GP. (M): 9873677817 Email: [email protected]
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 10.09.2026
“xxx xxx xxx
14. Accordingly, the Impugned Order dated 26.09.2018 passed by the learned Tribunal is set aside. The respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of the family pension in accordance with all applicable rules, and to pass an appropriate order thereon within a period of eight weeks from today. In case the petitioner is found entitled to the grant of the family pension, the arrears thereof be released with effect from the date on which the
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 11:21:45
petitioner made her first application for grant of the family pension, within twelve months of this judgment.
xxx xxx xxx”
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
SEPTEMBER 10, 2026 c
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 11:21:45
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents are bound to comply with the orders of the Division Bench dated 17th March 2025 regarding family pension.
Whether further time is required for the respondents to comply with the said orders.
Raj Kumari
R. Mohanraja & Anr.
Mini Pushkarn
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court