Disposed

Dinesh Saini v. Yash Pal & Anr.

Delhi HC17 Sept 2026CONT.CAS(C)/1632/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petition alleged wilful disobedience of orders concerning an OBC certificate issued to the petitioner’s daughter. The respondents stated that the SDM notice had been withdrawn, and the petitioner accepted that his grievance was satisfied. The High Court disposed of the petition accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of after the petitioner stated that the grievance stood satisfied because the SDM notice had been withdrawn.

Dinesh Saini Vs Yash Pal & Anr. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~39

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision: 17.09.2026

¶4

CNR No. DLHC010422532026

¶5

- CONT.CAS(C) 1632/2026

¶6

DINESH SAINI .....Petitioner

¶7

Through: Mr. Madhav K. Sareen and Mr. Raunak Wahi, Advocates Email: [email protected] Mob: 9871909309

¶8

versus

¶9

YASH PAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh and Ms. Pearl Khurana, Advocates Mob: 9811188892 Email: [email protected]

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶12

MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL):

¶13

The present petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 27^th March, 2023, passed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, in Contempt Petition (Crl.) 01/2023, and the order dated 13^th August, 2024, passed by this Court in CRL.M.C. 3429/2023 .

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier, a complaint had been filed by one Mr. Raj Babu Dvivedy and Mr. Vanshraj, with regard to the Other Backward Class (“OBC”) Certificate issued in favour of Ms. Devika Saini, i.e., the daughter of the petitioner.

¶15

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Da te:2 2.09.2026 11:42:49

¶16

Page 1 of 5

¶17

However, the said OBC Certificate issued in favour of the daughter of the petitioner was found to be genuine.

¶18

Attention of this Court has been drawn to the order dated 27^th March, 2023, passed in Contempt Petition (Crl.) 01/2023, wherein, it was noted as follows:

¶19

“xxx xxx xxx

¶20

”

¶21

By referring to the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Trial Court had taken note of the fact that on account of the Status Report filed on behalf of the Assistant Sub-Inspector (“ASI”), Police Station (“PS”) Maurice Nagar, Delhi, the OBC Certificate

¶22

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Da te:2 2.09.2026 11:42:49

¶23

Page 2 of 5

¶24

issued in favour of Ms. Devika Saini, was found to be genuine.

¶25

He further draws the attention of this Court to the order dated 13^th August, 2024, passed by this Court in CRL.M.C. 3429/2023 , wherein, it has been held as follows:

¶26

“xxx xxx xxx

¶27

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Da te:2 2.09.2026 11:42:49

¶28

Page 3 of 5

¶29

xxx xxx xxx”

¶30

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has again received a notice dated 18^th June, 2026, from the Sub Divisional Magistrate (“SDM”) Patel Nagar, Government of NCT of Delhi (“GNCTD”), on the basis of a fresh complaint/representation on behalf of respondent no. 2, i.e., Mr. Vanshraj, the same person, who had filed the earlier complaint, with respect to the validity of the OBC Certificate of his daughter.

¶31

The said notice, as received by the petitioner, is reproduced as under:

¶32

“

¶33

”

¶34

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Da te:2 2.09.2026 11:42:49

¶35

Page 4 of 5

¶36

In response, learned counsel appearing for the respondent has handed over a copy of Status Report dated 16^th September, 2026, which is taken on record.

¶37

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the notice dated 18^th June, 2026, issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (“SDM”), Patel Nagar, GNCTD, has been withdrawn vide order dated 15^th September, 2026, issued by the office of SDM, Patel Nagar, GNCTD. 11. Accordingly, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands satisfied.

¶38

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.

¶39

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶40

SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 ak

¶41

Signature Not Verified

¶42

Page 5 of 5

¶43

Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Da te:2 2.09.2026 11:42:49

Dinesh Saini v. Yash Pal & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Saini v. Yash Pal & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kundan Lal Arya Vs Mr Challa Sreenivasulu Setty Chairman and Managing Director & Anr.

All India Audit & Accounts Officers Association & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Rubaljeet Singh Sayal Vs Sushil Kumar Bhola & Anr.

Rajeev Ranjan Vs Shri Sanjeev Khirwar (Ias) & Ors.

Janak Datwani Vs Anand Datwani

Sh Prafulla Kumar Vs Col (Dr) Sarvjeet Kaur

Poonam Bansal Vs Dheeraj Bansal

Shri Shobhit Gaur & Ors. Vs Union of India through Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, & Ors.