Kshitij Malik v. Shri Mugilrajan D & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner did not press the contempt petition and it was dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn
The petitioner did not press the contempt petition and it was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
CNR No. DLHC010389132026
.....Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person
versus
SHRI MUGILRAJAN D & ORS.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Ranjeev Khatana (SPC) Mr Arjav Sethi, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 09.09.2026
JASMEET SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 / (MS)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 10:58:44
Kshitij Malik
Shri Mugilrajan D
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court