Surinder Singh Tirath Singh Chandhok v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a revision petition alleging non-compliance of an impugned order under O.M.P. 694/2011, the petitioner sought calculations of payments. The respondent bank, citing the Vidya Drolia judgment on non-arbitrability of DRT matters under the DRT Act, argued the impugned order was inoperative. The Court directed the bank to supply the calculations and disposed of the petition. The question of law rega
What did the court decide?
Directing the respondents to supply calculations on which SARFAESI proceedings were initiated to the petitioner's counsel; the present petition and a pending application are disposed of.