The Delhi High Court dismissed the present petition which was withdrawn by the petitioner, submitting that the impugned order had been complied with. The pending application stands disposed of.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
CNR No. DLHC011103622025
RATAN LAL BANSAL, PROPRIETOR OF M/S JAI AMBEY
FOOTWEAR
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shayuk Kumar with Ms. Mansi Bidhuri, Advocates. (M): 8595615868 Email: [email protected]
versus
VIJAY DHALIA, PROPRIETOR OF M/S JAY TRADING COMPANY .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 21.08.2026
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
AUGUST 21, 2026/ c
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/08/2026 at 10:32:59
RATAN LAL BANSAL, PROPRIETOR OF M/S JAI AMBEY FOOTWEAR
VIJAY DHALIA, PROPRIETOR OF M/S JAY TRADING COMPANY
MINI PUSHKARNA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
