Delhi HC allowed withdrawal of a contempt petition filed for violation of a stay order, holding the order did not restrict recovery of past arrears, and granted liberty to file a clarification application in the appeal.
Permission to withdraw the contempt petition and file an application in the appeal for clarification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
CNR No. DLHC010386612026
RAJEEV JAIN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohit Priya Ranjan, Mr. Gaurav Agrawal and Ms. Ritika Rani, Advocates
versus
GULSHAN KUMAR JAIN THROUGH LR DEEPAK JAIN
.....Respondent
Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 19.08.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/08/2026 at 11:31:33
stay against the recovery of the past arrears.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 19, 2026 N
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/08/2026 at 11:31:33
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajeev Jain & Anr.
Gulshan Kumar Jain
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
