A contempt petition alleged wilful disobedience of two orders of the Delhi High Court. The court informed that those orders had been set aside by a Division Bench in LPA 742/2026 and that no orders could therefore be passed in the present petition. The petition and pending application were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
CNR No. DLHC010386462026
MAHADEV SINGH SEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocate.
versus
RAJINDER DHAMIJA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC, GNCTD with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Ms. Ananya Saxena, Advocates for respondent nos. 2 and 3. (M): 8527074562 Email: [email protected] Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC with Ms. Shaoni Das, Advocate. (M): 9911991166
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 17.09.2026
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2026 at 10:48:10
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
SEPTEMBER 17, 2026 c
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2026 at 10:48:10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether relief can be granted in a contempt petition based on orders that have been set aside by a Division Bench.
Mahadev Singh Sen
Rajinder Dhamija
Others
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
