In a contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a previous order, the Court, noting that demolition of the subject property was scheduled for the day, disposed of the petition without deciding the merits. The respondents were directed to file an ATR in the main writ petition by September 22, 2026.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
CNR No. DLHC010359162026
Through: Mr. Ankit Singh Sinsinwar and Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocates.
versus
SH. SANJEEV KHIRWAR AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal and Ms. Shweta Singh, Advocates for R-1 to R-3.
Mr. Niraj Kumar and Mr. Chaitanya Kumar, Advocates. Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar, Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh and Mr. Syed Mohd. Shoeb, Advocates for R-4.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
%
06.08.2026
Page 1 of 2
CONT.CAS(C) 1400/2026
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/08/2026 at 11:12:56
AMIT BANSAL, J
AUGUST 6, 2026
Vivek/-
Page 2 of 2
CONT.CAS(C) 1400/2026
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/08/2026 at 11:12:56
Satish Kumar
Sanjeev Khirwar
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
