A petition under Article 227 sought setting aside a family court order granting access of a minor child to her paternal grandmother and remand on parental alienation. The underlying guardianship petition was finally dismissed, making this petition infructuous; it was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
VINEET TANEJA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Shreya Singhal, Ms. Kushagra, Advs.
versus
RITU TANEJA .....Respondent Through: Respondent in person, through Vc. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
“1. Set aside the impugned order dated 29.07.2025 passed in GP Petition No 48 of 2018 pending before Ld. Family Judge (01), South, Saket and grant reasonable physical & virtual access of minor child Riddhi@ Gungun to meet her ailing paternal grandmother in the interest of justice and paramount welfare of the minor child and/or
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2026 at 10:58:09
learned Family Courts, Judge-01, South Saket, New Delhi.
AMIT SHARMA, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2026/ kr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2026 at 10:58:09
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vineet Taneja
Ritu Taneja
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
