Dismissed¶¶24

Sonal Singh v. Mayank Tomer

Delhi HC18 Feb 2026CM(M)/389/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CM(M) 389/2026, High Court of Delhi, Justice Amit Sharma, decided 18.02.2026. Sonal Singh (in person) v. Mayank Tomer. Petition under Article 227 Constitution of India read with Section 151 CPC seeking permission to travel to Sweden/Malmo and other countries for 15 days (1–15 June 2026) with minor son Vikirn Singh; divorce pending as HMA No. 1/2024 before Family Court; no custody/visitation proceedings and no restrictive order on record; held not maintainable — dismissed and disposed of.

What did the court decide?

None — petition dismissed as not maintainable; pending application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶¶24

Sonal Singh Vs Mayank Tomer — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~62

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CM(M) 389/2026

¶4

SONAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person (through VC).

¶5

versus

¶6

MAYANK TOMER .....Respondent

¶7

Through:

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 18.02.2026

¶12

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶13

CM APPL. 11176/2026 (Exemption)

¶14

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.

¶15

CM(M) 389/2026

¶16

The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 of the CPC seeks the following prayers:-

¶17

“a. Petitioner no. 1 seeks permission to travel internationally alongwith petitioner no. 2 (minor son) namely Vikirn Singh to Sweden, Malmo & other countries for a period of 15 days i.e. 1st to 15th of June, 2026 for holiday visit.

¶18

b. Pass any other order necessary, which this Hon’ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶19

As per the averments made in the present petition, a divorce proceeding is pending between the parties before the learned Family Court, being HMA No. 1/2024. It is further stated in the petition, that there are no custody or

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2026 at 10:58:27

¶22

visitation proceedings pending before any Court. Admittedly, no order has been passed by any Court, either restricting or requiring the petitioner to seek any permission from any Court.

¶23

The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, is to be exercised for superintendence over all Courts and Tribunals. No order of any proceedings pending between the parties before learned Family Court or any other Court with respect to the aforesaid prayers has been placed on record by the petitioner for this Court to adjudicate.

¶24

In view of the above, present petition is not maintainable and is dismissed and disposed of.

¶25

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

¶26

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶27

FEBRUARY 18, 2026/ nk/db

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2026 at 10:58:27

Sonal Singh v. Mayank Tomer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonal Singh v. Mayank Tomer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Archana Mohan Vs Anju Bala & Anr.

Shri Shyam Tandon Vs Mr. Mohd. Haroon Japanwala & Ors.

Shri Gian Chand Ralhan Vs Shri Gurvinder Singh Bakshi

Eminence Townships India Private Limited Vs Sushil Aggarwal and Anr.

Kamini Tiwari Vs Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari

Mamchand @ Mc Mahesh Vs Shri Vaibhav Chaurasia and Others

Vineet Taneja Vs Ritu Taneja

Krishna Devi Vs Rajesh Kaushik & Anr.

Vinod Kumar Gaur Vs Yogesh Dube

Sapna Sharma and Others Vs Amit Kumar and Anr.

Jan Jagruti Foundation Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Harinder Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs Jbc Industries

Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. Vs Ms Frans Global Infotech Ltd.

Vineet Taneja Vs Ritu Taneja