Petition withdrawn by counsel after some arguments; the High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn along with pending applications, without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
SURAJ PRAKASH LUTHRA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Indira Goswami, Advocate (DHCLSC) and Mr. Bhavya Tokas, Advocates.
versus
SMT. SAROJ & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R % 18.02.2026
RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J
FEBRUARY 18, 2026/ v/ ik
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2026 at 12:11:54
Suraj Prakash Luthra
Smt. Saroj & Ors.
Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
