Petitioner's assets were de-freezed by order dated 09.04.2026; counsel stated the writ petition challenging the freeze had become infructuous, and the Division Bench dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~114
M/S RTC GLOBAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Akash Verma & Mr. Teevra Mishra, Advocates. versus THE ASSESSING OFFICER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC with Ms. Naincy Jain & Ms. Madhvi Shukla, JSCs. Mr. Amol Sharma, Advocate for R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R % 13.04.2026
DINESH MEHTA, J.
VINOD KUMAR, J.
APRIL 13, 2026/ nk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/04/2026 at 13:36:31
M/S RTC Global
The Assessing Officer
Dinesh Mehta
Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
