Avisha Mittal v. Indraprasth Institute of Information Technology Delhi & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Short infructuity-disposal order: Delhi High Court, W.P.(C) 17185/2025, Jasmeet Singh J, 23.02.2026. Petitioner Avisha Mittal (counsel Akshay Goel) filed under Article 226 seeking refund of Rs. 2,25,000/- withheld by respondent No. 1, Indraprasth Institute of Information Technology Delhi (counsel Arjun Mitra); respondent UGC represented by Om Prakash, Chandresh Pratap, Vikram Singh Arya, Swati Mishra, Prince Yadav and Ankita Yadav. Refund already effected per counsel; petition disposed of as infructuous. Keywords: fee/amount refund, Article 226, infructuous petition, disposal, pending applications. No precedents cited; no dissenting opinion.
What did the court decide?
No independent relief decreed by the Court; petition disposed of as infructuous after respondent No. 1 indicated the withheld sum had already been refunded. ¶11