Interlocutory application seeking to take additional documents on record was disposed of as infructuous because the underlying writ petition had already been disposed of. The order records no findings on merits and decides nothing of substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
MS NIDHI ARYA THROUGH SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI RAMESH DALAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Mr. K. Gangadharan, Ms. Prachi Chawla and Ms. Prachi Sohi, Advs.
versus
M/S OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PVT LTD & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Harsh Kaushik and Mr. Sachin Akhoury, Advs.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 27.02.2026
CM APPL. 13687/2026 (for taking on record additional documents)
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/P/AMG
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:42:15
Ms Nidhi Arya through Special Power of Attorney Holder Shri Ramesh Dalal
M/S OYO Hotels and Homes Pvt Ltd
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
