Petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act sought extension of the arbitral mandate in Arbitration Case No. DIAC/2701/01-20. The court allowed the petition and extended the arbitration period by nine months from 08.11.2024.
Period of Arbitration Case No. DIAC/2701/01-20 extended by nine months from 08.11.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-55
Through: Mr. Ankit, Advocate (through VC). versus
UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman Sahani and Ms. Ashima Chopra, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 08.05.2025
“A. Pass appropriate orders under the provisions of Section 29 A (4) and extend the period of Arbitration Case No. DIAC/2701/01-20 for further nine months from 08.11.2024 in the interest of Justice.”
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
MAY 8, 2025
ssc
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:31:19
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate period for Arbitration Case No. DIAC/2701/01-20 should be extended by nine months from 08.11.2024 under Section 29A(4).
1 provisions across 1 enactments
VM Construction
Union of India
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
