Testamentary petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh, the petitioner being unable to ascertain the respondent's address.
Liberty to withdraw and file the petition afresh granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-66
Through: Mr. Apurva Nagpal, Mr. Hrithik Kumar and Ms. Rudrakshi, Advs.
versus
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anbhinav Garg, Panel Counsel with Mr. Mihir Gujjewar, Adv for R- 1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 08.05.2025
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
MAY 8, 2025 aks/mj
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 17:51:50
Gurpreet Anand
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
