Allowed

Kushal Polysacks Private Limited v. My Preferred Transformation and Hospitality Private Limited

Delhi HC12 Sept 2025O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/756/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act sought a six-month extension of a sole arbitrator's mandate in lease-deed disputes. With respondent's consent, the Court extended the mandate by six months from 12.09.2025 and regularized the intervening period.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of Sole Arbitrator extended by six months from 12.09.2025; period from 31.07.2025 to 11.09.2025 regularized.

Kushal Polysacks Private Limited Vs My Preferred Transformation… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~62

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 756/2025

¶4

KUSHAL POLYSACKS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Rana S. Biswas, Mr. Yash Tripathi and Mr. Kartik Chettiar, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

MY PREFERRED TRANSFORMATION AND HOSPITALITY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, Ms. Mrinmayee Sahu and Mr. Tribhuvan, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶10

O R D E R % 12.09.2025

¶11

This petition is filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘1996 Act’) seeking extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator by a period of six months.

¶12

Disputes arose between the parties with respect to Lease Deed dated 20.10.2019. Petitioner filed a petition under Section 11(6) of 1996 Act in this Court being ARB.P. 895/2021, which was allowed on 17.12.2021 appointing the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. Mandate of the Arbitrator was extended by this Court vide order dated 12.12.2024 in O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 959/2024 by a period of six months, which expired on 30.07.2025. It is stated that the arbitral proceedings are at the stage of recording of evidence.

¶13

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 756/2025

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2025 at 12:36:46

¶17

Issue notice.

¶18

Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent and on instructions, submits that Respondent has no objection to the extension of mandate of the Arbitrator.

¶19

Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator is extended by a period of 06 months from 12.09.2025 and period between 31.07.2025 to 11.09.2025 is regularized.

¶20

Petition is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶21

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶22

SEPTEMBER 12, 2025

¶23

S.Sharma

¶24

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 756/2025

¶25

Page 2 of 2

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2025 at 12:36:46

Kushal Polysacks Private Limited v. My Preferred Transformation and Hospitality Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kushal Polysacks Private Limited v. My Preferred Transformation and Hospitality Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Enviro Infra Engineers Limited Vs Government of Chattisgarh, through M/S Public Health Engineering Division

M/S. State Construction Integrated Works of Administrative Department of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukra Vs National Highways Authority of India

Esha Kedia Vs Milan R Parekh & Ors.

Emco Limited Vs Delhi Transco Limited

Ircon International Ltd. Vs Afcons Infrastructure Ltd.

Vinod Kundra & Ors. Vs Abl Workspaces Private Limited

S B Protech Private Limited Vs Dlf Limited

M/S Century 21 Malls Private Limited Vs M/S Beyond Malls LLP

Orix Leasing and Financial Services India Ltd. Vs Gensol Engineering Ltd. & Ors.

Shri Sidhi Vinayak Infratech Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Bptp Limited

Jsw Ispat Special Products Limited Vs Bharat Petroresources Limited

Energy Efficiency Services Ltd. through Its Authorised Singnatory Mr Anil Agrawal Vs a One Realtors Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Mr K K Wadhwa

Dilshad Khan Vs Gnct of Delhi

Nkg Infrastructure Limited Vs Union of India through Director General Married Accommodation Project and Anr.