Petitioner sought appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for disputes over unpaid dues relating to civil and structural works. With settlement talks failed, the court appointed Mr. Gajendra Giri as Sole Arbitrator under DIAC auspices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
SHRI SIDHI VINAYAK INFRATECH PVT LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sunil Mund, Mr. Vedant Mund and Mr. Tribhuvan, Advocates.
versus
M/S BPTP LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kaushik Poddar, Mr. Akash Dala1 and Mr. Mohd. Hanzala Reza, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 11.09.2025
ARB.P. 32/2025
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2025 at 12:31:12
Arbitrator.
JYOTI SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 Ch
ARB.P. 32/2025
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2025 at 12:31:12
1 issue framed by the court
Should a Sole Arbitrator be appointed under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for disputes over the work order?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Sidhi Vinayak Infratech Pvt Ltd
M/s BPTP Limited
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
