Disposed

Mr. Rajesh Jain v. Mr. Jitender Jain & Ors.

Delhi HC8 May 2025CS(OS)/445/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Partition suits over Sadar Thana Road and Veer Nagar properties disposed of as parties settled their shares by sale/relinquishment deeds and all inter-se claims regarding their parents' estate stood satisfied; suits permitted to be withdrawn unconditionally, interim orders vacated.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mr. Rajesh Jain Vs Mr. Jitender Jain & Ors. — Partition | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~13 and 14

¶2

*	IN THE HIGH	COURT O	F D	ELHI	AT NEW DELHI
+	CS(OS) 445/2021	& I.A. 1213	5/202	1
	MR. RAJESH JA	IN			.....Plaintiff
		Through:	Mr.	Atul	Singh, Advocate with
		versus	plai	ntiff in	person
	MR. JITENDER J	AIN & ORS	.		.....Defendants
		Through:	Mr. Mr. in p Mr. Mr.	Lalit Anmo erson Harsh Rahul	Gupta, Mr. Priyansh Jain, l, Advs. for D-1 with D-1 it Jain, Mr. Deepak Yadav, Kumar, Advocates for D-2
			Mr.	Dev	Raj Sharma, Ms. Shilpi,
14			Adv	ocates	for D-4 with D-4 in person
+	CS(OS) 456/2023 PANKAJ JAIN	& I.A. 3526	3/202	4	.....Plaintiff
	JITENDER JAIN	Through: versus (HUF) & O Through:	Mr. Adv RS. Mr.	Dev ocates Lalit	Raj Sharma, Ms. Shilpi, .....Defendants Gupta, Mr. Priyansh Jain,
			Mr. with Mr. Mr.	Anmo D-2 i Harsh Rahul	l Ghai, Advs. for D-1 & 2 n person it Jain, Mr. Deepak Yadav, Kumar, Advocates for D-3
CO HO	RAM: N'BLE MS. JUSTI	CE MANM O R D E R	EET	PRITA	M SINGH ARORA

¶3

% 08.05.2025 CS(OS) 445/2021

¶4

Plaintiff, defendant no. 1, defendant no. 2 and defendant no. 3 are present in Court and are identified by the learned counsel for the plaintiff as

¶5

This is a digitally signed order.

¶6

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2025 at 11:52:59

¶7

Page 1 of 3

¶8

well as defendants.

¶9

It is stated that plaintiff and defendant no. 2 have sold their 1/3^rd share each in property bearing no. 2683-84, Sadar Thana Road, New Delhi110006 (‘Sadar Thana property') to defendant no. 1 vide registered lease deed dated 28.01.2025 for valuable consideration, which has been duly received.

¶10

It is stated that plaintiff and defendant no. 2 have sold their 1/6^th share each in the property bearing no. 151, Veer Nagar, Jain Colony, New Delhi110007 ('Veer Nagar property') to defendant no. 1 vide registered lease deed dated 01.05.2025 for valuable consideration, which has been duly received.

¶11

It is stated that defendant no. 3, the sister of the plaintiff, defendant no. 1 and defendant no. 2 had already relinquished her share in both these properties vide separate relinquishment deed dated 21.02.2006 and 14.02.2023 respectively and as such she is left with no right, title, or interest in the suit properties.

¶12

It is stated that since the subject matter of this suit was only the partition of the two (2) immovable properties, the cause of action of the plaintiff as well as defendant nos. 1 and 2 stands satisfied and, therefore, the plaintiff seeks liberty to unconditionally withdraw the present suit.

¶13

Defendant nos. 1, 2 and 3 also state that since their claims also qua the two (2) immovable properties stand satisfied, they as well have no objections to the suit being withdrawn.

¶14

Parties in fact state that all their inter-se claims with respect to estate of their parents i.e., late Shri Ajit Prasad Jain and late Smt. Trishla Jain stand settled between the parties and there are no claims left against each other.

¶15

In view of the above, satisfaction of the claims, the suit is disposed of

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2025 at 11:52:59

¶18

Page 2 of 3

¶19

after recording that all claims between the parties stand satisfied.

¶20

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶21

Interim order stands vacated.

¶22

Future dates stand cancelled.

¶23

CS(OS) 456/2023

¶24

Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that subject matter of this suit is property bearing no. 151, Veer Nagar, Jain Colony, New Delhi-110007 ('Veer Nagar property').

¶25

He states that plaintiff has 25% share in the suit property and 25% share is owned by defendant no. 1, Jitender Jain HUF.

¶26

He states that since the remaining 50% share now vests with defendant no. 2 by virtue of the release lease deed dated 01.05.2025, there is no inter-se disputes remaining between the plaintiff, defendant nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. It is a matter of record that the plaintiff and defendant no. 2 are the members of defendant no. 1 HUF.

¶27

He as well state that claims agitated in this suit stand satisfied and he as well seeks liberty to withdraw the present suit.

¶28

The present suit as well is disposed of withdrawn recording that the claims of the plaintiff stand satisfied.

¶29

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶30

Interim order stands vacated.

¶31

Future dates stand cancelled.

¶32

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J

¶33

MAY 8, 2025/ mt/MG

¶34

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶35

This is a digitally signed order.

¶36

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2025 at 11:52:59

¶37

Page 3 of 3

Mr. Rajesh Jain v. Mr. Jitender Jain & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mr. Rajesh Jain v. Mr. Jitender Jain & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meenu Vs Roshani & Ors.

Lipi Gupta Vs Sangeeta Agarwal

N.K. Magu Vs Sudesh Kumar Sadh

Shri Jagdish Singh Malik & Ors. Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Porto Emporios Shipping Inc. Vs Indian Oil Corporation Limitedr & Anr.

M/S Juniper Green Energy Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Mr. Mohammad Rafiuddin & Ors.

Anjali Birla D/O Shri Om Birla Vs X Corp. & Ors.

Reckitt Benckiser India Private Limited Vs Ms. Sukhleen Aneja & Anr.

Lipi Gupta Vs Sangeeta Agarwal

M/S Sandhu Motor Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs Jitender Saini

Wannamo Marketing Private Limited Vs Chatpay Commerce Private Limited

Cars 24 Financial Services Private Limited Vs Shaik Layeeq Rahman Proprietor of M/S Ss Cars & Anr.

Pankaj Jain Vs Jitender Jain (Huf) & Ors.

Sawan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Ashok Kumar & Ors.