Petitioners, tenants who allegedly scuffled with a bailiff taking vacant possession in execution proceedings, sought quashing of the FIR under Sections 186/353/34 IPC. The High Court found no case made out on the FIR averments and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
PRINCE AGGARWAL & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr.C.M.Grover, Adv.
versus THE STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Nitish Dhawan, Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Mr. Manan Wadhwa and Ms. Luv Mahajan, Advs with SI Avinash Kumar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 12:57:51
police, alleging obstruction and disruption of Court proceedings, in violation of the orders of the learnd District Judge, considering that it is not only an offence against the public servant but it also an endeavour to obstruct the process of law.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
DECEMBER 5, 2025/ ng
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/12/2025 at 12:57:51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 0103/2023 under Sections 186/353/34 IPC alleging obstruction of a bailiff executing a decree could be quashed.
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Prince Aggarwal & Ors.
The State Govt NCT of Delhi
Anr.
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
