Petitioner sought to withdraw a criminal writ petition, stating the underlying dispute was still pending. The court recorded counsel's statement and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
MS ANJALI DHAMEJA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jatin Bhardwaj, Mr. Adish Jain, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Mr. Nitish Dhawan and Mr. Manan Wadhwa, Advs. with SI Chitra, P.S.South Rohini..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 06.12.2025
W.P.(CRL) 2358/2025
Mr. Jatin Bhardwaj, Ld. Counsel who appears for the petitioner states that due to some dispute still pending between the parties, the petitioner does not want to press the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
The statement made by the Ld. Counsel is taken on record and petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
DECEMBER 6, 2025/lks/na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/12/2025 at 12:16:57
MS Anjali Dhameja
State NCT of Delhi
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
