Nilesh Jindal v. the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC3 Jul 2025CRL.M.C./2371/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL.M.C. 2371/2025; Nilesh Jindal v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi; Delhi High Court; Section 528 BNSS 2023 quashing petition; FIR No. 0120/2024; Section 318(4) IPC cheating forgery mischief fraud; Cyber Police Station Dwarka; Memorandum of Understanding dated 10.03.2025; settlement/compounding; complainant no objection; Rs.15 Lacs settlement amount (Rs.10 Lacs received + Rs.5 Lacs Demand Draft in Court); FIR and subsequent proceedings quashed; Justice Neena Bansal Krishna; order dated 03.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of FIR No. 0120/2024 under Sections 318(4) IPC registered at Cyber Police Station, Dwarka together with all subsequent proceedings, pursuant to the settlement (Memorandum of Understanding dated 10.03.2025) and the Complainant's no-objection. ¶¶19

Nilesh Jindal Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~48

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 2371/2025

¶4

NILESH JINDAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mamta Yadav, Advocate with Petitioner in person

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

¶7

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Kailash and HC Praveen, P.S. Cyber, Dwarka R-2 in person

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R

¶10

% 03.07.2025

¶11

Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the Petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No. 0120/2024 under Section 318(4) IPC registered at Cyber Police Station, Dwarka and all proceedings arising therefrom in terms of Memorandum of Understanding dated 10.03.2025.

¶12

The FIR No. 0120/2024 was got registered under Section 318(4) IPC at Cyber Police Station, Dwarka on the basis of complaint made by the Complainant for cheating, forgery, mischief and fraud committed by the Petitioner.

¶13

The Petitioner and the Respondent are present in person and have been identified by the Investigating Officer.

¶14

In terms of Memorandum of Understanding dated 10.03.2025, it has

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/07/2025 at 12:05:11

¶16

been agreed that the alleged offence of cheating has been settled and a sum of Rs.15 Lacs has been received by the Complainant, who endorses the Memorandum of Understanding dated 10.03.2025. The Respondent has already received Rs.10 Lacs and the Demand Draft of remaining amount of Rs.5 Lacs has been handed over today in the Court, which has been accepted by the Respondent.

¶17

The parties have endorsed the amicable Settlement and accepted the terms thereof voluntarily and have undertaken to remain bound by the terms of the Settlement.

¶18

It is submitted on behalf of the Complainant that she has no objection if the FIR is quashed against the Petitioner on account of the Settlement already arrived at between the parties.

¶19

In view of the submissions made, the Petition is allowed. Accordingly, FIR No. 0120/2024 under Sections 318(4) IPC registered at Cyber Police Station, Dwarka with all the subsequent proceedings is hereby quashed.

¶20

The Petition alongwith pending Applications, if any, stands disposed of.

¶21

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶22

JULY 3, 2025 N

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/07/2025 at 12:05:11

Nilesh Jindal v. the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nilesh Jindal v. the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ferdus Yesmin Barbhuiya & Anr. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Anima Kumari Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sateesh Kumar Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Padam Kumar Sharma Vs the State ( NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Vinod Kumar & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi through SHO Ps Rajouri Garden Delhi & Anr.

Sultan Azim Vs the State NCT of Delhi