Smt. Kusum Goyal and Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi.

Delhi HC2 Dec 2025CONT.CAS(C)/665/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CONT.CAS(C) 665/2025; Delhi High Court; Justice Amit Sharma; 02.12.2025; contempt of courts; Sections 2(b)/10/12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971; civil contempt; MCD; unauthorised construction; second floor demolition order; Section 349 DMC Act vacation notice; watch and ward letter SHO Hauz Quazi; Special Task Force M.C. Mehta; W.P.(C) 13806/2024 Kusum Goyal vs. MCD; status report Executive Engineer Rakesh Brijwal; disposed with liberty to revive on further non-compliance.

What did the court decide?

No further directions issued; petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive it in case of any further non-compliance by respondent/MCD; MCD to act in accordance with law in furtherance of its status report. ¶¶38

Smt. Kusum Goyal and Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶38

Issue for consideration

Whether MCD complied with the order/undertaking dated 01.10.2024 in W.P.(C) 13806/2024 regarding unauthorised construction at the subject property, and whether contempt proceedings or further directions were warranted.

¶¶13

Court's answer

In view of the affidavit/status report filed by MCD, no further directions are called for in the contempt petition.

¶¶36

Ratio / Principle

MCD shall take action in accordance with law in furtherance of the status report.

¶¶37

Key takeaways

The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive it in case of any further non-compliance by respondent/MCD.ratio¶¶38

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Delhi (Amit Sharma, J.), order dated 02.12.2025 in CONT.CAS(C) 665/2025: contempt petition under Ss. 2(b)/10/12, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Smt. Kusum Goyal & Anr. alleging willful disobedience of the order/undertaking dated 01.10.2024 in W.P.(C) 13806/2024 (Kusum Goyal vs. MCD), whereby MCD was directed to act strictly in accordance with law against unauthorised construction at property no. 1887 (part), Gali Lehaswa, Bazaar Sita Ram, Delhi. MCD's status report by its Executive Engineer recorded booking of the property on 25.09.2024 (entire second floor without SBP), a demolition order for the entire second floor, a vacation notice dated 29.04.2025 under S. 349 DMC Act, partial demolitions on 05.05.2025 and 07.07.2025, and watch-and-ward letters to SHO, P.S. Hauz Quazi. None appeared for the petitioners. The Court held that, in view of the status report, no further directions were called for, observed that MCD shall act in accordance with law in furtherance of the status report, and disposed of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to revive it upon any further non-compliance.

¶1

$~98

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 665/2025

¶4

SMT. KUSUM GOYAL AND ANR .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: None. versus

¶6

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shilpa Dewan, ASC for MCD. Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, CGSC with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Mr. Mohammad Junaid Mahmood, Ms. Prajna Pandita, Advs. with SI Meghraj S. Poonia, P.S. Hauz Qazi. for Delhi Police.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 02.12.2025

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present petition under Sections 2(b)/10/12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeks the following prayers: -

¶13

“1. Issue civil contempt proceedings and punish the contemnor with the simple imprisonment which may extend to 6 months and fine for willful disobedience of order and undertaking dated 01/10/2024 given in W. P. (C) No. 13806 of2024. titled as "Kusum Goyal vs. MCD."

¶14

Any other appropriate directions may be issued in favor of the petitioners and against contemnors which may deem fit and equitable in the present conditions.”

¶15

Vide order dated 01.10.2024 in W.P.(C) 13806/2024, learned Single

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 12:04:07

¶18

Judge had passed the following directions: -

¶19

“5. It is made clear that the aforesaid submissions are recorded without prejudice to the right; and contentions of respondent No. 2 or any other owners/occupants of the subject property, whose rights and remedies, available in law, are expressly reserved. MCD is directed to take action strictly in accordance with law. and after complying with all statutory requirements.

¶20

In the event the petitioner has any further grievance with regard to unauthorised construction, they are at liberty to approach the Special Task Force [STF'], constituted by the Supreme Court vide orders dated 24.04.2018 and 18.07.2018 in W.P.(C) 4677/1985 [M.C. Mehta vs Union of India & Ors.]. This direction is made with reference to the decisions of the Division Bench in Devender vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors [order dated 20.09.2018 in W.P.(C) 1807/2018], Sneh Lata & Anr. vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. [order dated 08.04.2019 in LPA 245120 19], Fazruddin vs. DDA & Ors. [order dated 23.04.2019 in WP (C) 4649/2017]. and in Himanshu vs. East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. [order dated 31.07.2023 in W.P.(C) 8104/2022]. and decisions of Coordinate Benches in Abdul Gaffar vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors. [order dated 28.02.2019 in W.P.(C) 1773/2019] and Rashiduddin Malik vs. MCD & Ors. [order dated 02.09.2024 in WP (C) 12102/2024].”

¶21

In pursuance of the aforesaid directions, an affidavit/status report on behalf of respondent/MCD authored by Mr. Rakesh Brijwal, Executive Engineer, (Bldg.)- II, City SP Zone, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Nigam Bhawan, 2^nd Floor, Old Hindu College, Kashmere Gate, Delhi-06, has been placed on record stating as under: -

¶22

“4. That it is respectfully submitted that the property bearing no. property bearing no. 1887 (part), Gali Lehaswa, Bazaar Sita Ram, Delhi- 110006 was booked vide file no. 205/UC /77/(BII/CSPZ/2024 dated 25.09.2024 for unauthorized construction in the form of entire second floor without SBP (Ground Floor & First Floor old and occupied) and after following due process of law

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 12:04:07

¶25

demolition order dated 04.12.2025 was passed in respect of entire second floor in the subject property. A copy of demolition order dated 04.12.2024 is annexed herewith as Annexure- A.

¶26

That it is submitted that in execution thereof demolition actions were planned on 30.12.2024, 14.02.2025, 24.02.2025, 19.03.2025 & 03.04.2025, but the same were not executed either due to nonavailability of nonavailability of police force or shortage of time.

¶27

That it is submitted that at the time of booking of the property i.e, second floor was found to be occupied illegally however imposition of GRAP restriction and thereafter imposition of Model Code of Conduct of General Election vacation notice was issued on 29.04.2025 under section 349 of the DMC Act Gupta/Owner/ Occupier/Builder thereby directing her to vacate the premises/unauthorized construction within 24 hours of the receipt of the order failing which the MCD may take further action against the aforesaid premises at the risk and cost of the owner/occupier. A copy of vacation notice dated 29.04.2025 is annexed herewith. Further action in the matter was planed on 05.05.2025 wherein one 01 RCC panel at the roof of second floor was demolished partially. Photograph of the demolition action taken 05.05.2025 are annexed as Annexure-B.

¶28

That it is submitted that further, a watch and ward letter dated 05.05.2025 was also issued to the SHO P.S. Hauz Quazi to keep strict watch and ward over the demolished portion so that further construction could not take place. A copy of watch and ward letter dated 05.05.2025 is annexed herewith as Annexure-C.

¶29

That it is submitted that in continuation thereof further demolition programme was fixed on 11.06.202 and 25.06.2025 but the same were not executed either due to shortage of time. However, in the programme scheduled on 07.07.2025, 01 panel and 02 griders were cut from the roof of the second floor, thereby the second floor was made inhabitable. Photograph of the demolition action taken 07.07.2025 are annexed as Annexure-D.

¶30

It is submitted that to keep strict watch and ward over the demolished portion so that further construction could not take place a watch and ward letter dated 08.07.2025 was also issued to the

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 12:04:07

¶33

SHO P.S. Hauz Quazi. A copy of watch and ward letter dated 08.07.2025 is annexed herewith as Annexure-E.”

¶34

None appears on behalf of the petitioner today.

¶35

In view of the aforesaid affidavit/status report, no further directions are called for.

¶36

Needless to state that MCD shall take action in accordance with law in furtherance of the aforesaid status report.

¶37

The present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case of any further non-compliance by the respondent/MCD.

¶38

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶39

DECEMBER 2, 2025/ kr

¶40

This is a digitally signed order.

¶41

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 12:04:07

Smt. Kusum Goyal and Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Kusum Goyal and Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeet Kumar Vs Sunita

Shri Bhagwan Vs Sh. Dharmendra and Ors.

Yashvardhan Shrivastav Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Sumit Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Soha Kaustubh Samak Vs Union of India and Ors.

Smt. Balwant Kaur Vs Manish Kumar Gupta & Ors.

Rajat Arora Vs Shri Ashwani Kumar,the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Kanishka Shekhawat Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sanjeet Kumar Vs Sunita

Shri Bhagwan Vs Sh. Dharmendra and Ors.

Yashvardhan Shrivastav Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Saral Advanced Diagnostic Private Limited Vs Deepak Jain & Ors.

Sk Sales Vs Ms. Shubhagata Kumar Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax and Another & Anr.

Apna Agro Cold Private Limited Vs Union of India and Ors.