Petition challenging rejection of credit linked back ended capital investment subsidy for a cold storage project was dismissed in default for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite notice; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
Through: None.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Subhash Tanwar with Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Mr. Harshit Deswal, Ms. Priyanka Kumari, Ms. Ritu Tanwar, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Briesh Kumar Tamber, Ms. Arani Mukherjee, Advs. for Indian Bank. Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv. for R-2 and 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
% 02.12.2025
“A. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or order or directions for setting aside / quashing of the impugned order bearing no. NHB/09BLK/0CS/000200/2018-19/8556 dated 25.03.2019 rejecting the grant of the credit linked back ended subsidy of Rs. 120 lakhs by the respondent no. 2 for the construction of the cold storage project of the petitioner namely Apna Agro Cold Pvt. Ltd. sanctioned under the scheme of respondent no.2 namely "Capital Investment subsidy for construction / expansion / modernization of the cold storage and storage for horticulture produce" which is in complete contrast to the earlier decisions of the Respondent No. 2 releasing subsidy to promoters of cold storages where missing technical components were installed after a period of two years.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 13:35:54
B. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate orders or directions to Respondent No. 2 to grant/release the credit linked back ended Subsidy of Rs. 120 lacs to the respondent no. 5 sanctioned to the petitioner for the construction of the cold store of the petitioner namely Apna Agro Cold Pet. Ltd. under the scheme of respondent no.2 namely "Capital Investment Subsidy for construction / expansion / modernization of the cold storage and storage for horticulture produce" at appropriate time of repayment of instalments of term loan of the petitioner.
C. Pass any such further orders, as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interests of justice.”
AMIT SHARMA, J
DECEMBER 2, 2025/ kr/ah
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2025 at 13:35:54
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Apna Agro Cold Private Limited
Union of India and Ors.
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
