Dismissed¶18

Vardhaman Choksi v. Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Delhi HC19 Dec 2025C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)/720/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; Tejas Karia, J.; 19.12.2025; batch withdrawal; C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 92/2021, 95/2021, 145/2021, 177/2021, 202/2021, 204/2021, 215/2021, 226/2021, 382/2021, 386/2021, 80/2022, 81/2022, 137/2022, 153/2022, 156/2022, 192/2022, 212/2022, 719/2022, 720/2022; trade mark petitions; dismissed as withdrawn; Registrar of Trade Marks; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Petitions dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the Petitioner. ¶18

Vardhaman Choksi Vs Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~36, 38, 41, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 53, 54, 57, 58, 60, 63 to 65, 68, 74 & 75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶2

- C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 92/2021

¶3

- C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 95/2021 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 145/2021 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 177/2021 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 202/2021

¶4

- C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 204/2021

¶5

- C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 215/2021 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 226/2021 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 382/2021 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 386/2021 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 80/2022 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 81/2022 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 137/2022 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 153/2022 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 156/2022

¶6

- C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 192/2022

¶7

- C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 212/2022

¶8

- C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 719/2022 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 720/2022

¶9

Advocates who appeared in these cases

¶10

Mr. Adarsh Ramanujan, Mr. Mustafa Alam, Ms. Yashima Sharma, Mr. Lakshya Kaushik, Mr. Sidharth Kausik, Ms. Divyanshi Bansal, Ms. Navya, Mr. Sumit, Mr. Zubair Hanifi, Ms. Saba & Ms. Aalia, Advocates for the Petitioner in these cases.

¶11

Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate along with Ms. Shikha Sachdeva, Mr. Manish Dhir, Ms. Kriti Rathi, Mr. Kranav Kapur, Ms. Annie Jacob, Mr. Jaskaran Singh Bindra & Ms. Annanya Mehan, Advocates for Respondent No.1 in these cases.

¶12

Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, CGSC along with Mr. Amlaan Kumar, Mr. Jatin Dhamija & Mr. Vinayak Aren, Advocates for Registrar of Trade Marks (through VC).

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/12/2025 at 11:57:52

¶15

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 19.12.2025

¶16

Although these matters were directed to be listed on 20.12.2025, the matters were taken up in advance today by consent of the learned Counsel for the Parties.

¶17

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Petitioner wishes to withdraw these Petitions.

¶18

Accordingly, the present Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶19

TEJAS KARIA, J

¶20

DECEMBER 19, 2025 / ‘A’

¶21

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/12/2025 at 11:57:52

Vardhaman Choksi v. Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vardhaman Choksi v. Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dcm Shriram Limited Vs Kohinoor Seed Fields India Private Limited & Anr.

Yonex Co. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Sunlight Sports Pvt. Ltd.

Divya Sai Lam Private Limited Vs Advance Laminates Private Limited & Anr.

Vardhaman Choksi Vs Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Vardhaman Choksi Vs Inpresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Vardhaman Choksi, Mangal, 20 Presidency Society, 7TH N.S. Road, Juhu Scheme, Mumbai. Vs Impresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. 12, Hauz Khas Village, New Delhi