Vardhaman Choksi v. Inpresario Entertainment and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court, Justice Tejas Karia, order dated 19.12.2025: nineteen trade mark IP Division petitions (C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 92/2021, 95/2021, 145/2021, 177/2021, 202/2021, 204/2021, 215/2021, 226/2021, 382/2021, 386/2021, 80/2022, 81/2022, 137/2022, 153/2022, 156/2022, 192/2022, 212/2022, 719/2022, 720/2022) dismissed as withdrawn at the Petitioner's request; counsel for Petitioner included Adarsh Ramanujan et al., Respondent No.1 represented by Chander M. Lall, Senior Advocate; Registrar of Trade Marks represented by Rukhmini Bobde, CGSC. Withdrawal/dismissal order only; no legal findings.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's request to withdraw allowed; all nineteen C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) Petitions dismissed as withdrawn. ¶18