The High Court of Delhi allowed the petitioner's application to withdraw the writ petition, dismissing the writ petition as withdrawn upon hearing.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was allowed; the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashok Kashyap, SPC with Mr. Kabir Hazarika, G.P. for UOI. Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, Mr. Animesh Rajoriya and Mr. Akash Kishor, Advocates for NESTS.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 12.08.2025
PRATEEK JALAN, J
AUGUST 12, 2025 UK/JM/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2025 at 12:19:30
Sumant Yadav
Union of India
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
