Writ petition claiming payment due to the petitioner's deceased husband was disposed of, treating the petition as a representation to be decided by the respondent within twelve weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
SHEELA .....Petitioner
Through: Adv. (appearance not given)
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shilpa Ohri, ASC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
CM APPL. 49085/2025 ( Exemption )
W.P.(C) 12034/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2025 at 12:38:28
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
ANISH DAYAL, J
AUGUST 11, 2025/ sky/zb
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2025 at 12:38:28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's claim as legal heir of her deceased husband should be considered by the respondent.
Sheela
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
