Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to reinstate after placing requisite documents on record. The court granted the liberty and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~68
RAVINDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Mr. Krishna Gopal Mishra, Mr. Saurabh Anand, Mr. Jitendra M Ojha, Mr. Navendu Pandey, Advs.
versus
INDO-TIBETAN BORDER POLICE FORCE AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, CGSC, Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, GP, Mr Divyansh Singh Dev and Mr. Raj Kumar Maurya Advs. with Mr. Devender Singh, DC (JAG) ITBP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER(ORAL)
% 13.08.2025
1. After some hearing, Mr. Sandeep Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to reinstitute it after placing requisite documents on record.
2. Leave and liberty is granted as aforesaid. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J
AUGUST 13, 2025/ AT
Signature Not VerifiedW.P.(C) 12182/2025
Page 1 of 1
Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:19.08.2025 10:33:25
Ravinder Kumar
Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force and Ors.
C. Hari Shankar
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
