Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition against MCD, with liberty to pursue the same cause of action before the Central Administrative Tribunal. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with that liberty granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~119
ANOOP SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Dipesh Singhal, Advocate.
versus
MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Akriti Singh, Advocate for Dr. Divya Swamy, SC for MCD & Mr. Yagyawalkya Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 13.08.2025
Mr. Dipesh Singhal, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal on the same cause of action
The writ petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
AUGUST 13, 2025 ‘pv/KA’/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:34:38
Anoop Singh
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Respondent No. 2
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
