Writ petition against Delhi Development Authority was withdrawn by counsel with liberty to file a Public Interest Litigation; court disposed of the petition as not pressed and granted liberty as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Tandon with Ms. Rinku Tiwary, Ms. Prerna Tandan and Mr. Vipul Saini, Advocates.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocate. Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 05.03.2025
MANOJ JAIN, J
MARCH 5, 2025 st/SS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 14:38:48
Dharampal
Delhi Development Authority through its Chairman
Respondent No.2
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
