Satya Gujral v. Delhi Development Authority

Delhi HC6 Mar 2025W.P.(C)/11668/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Satya Gujral v. Delhi Development Authority; W.P.(C) 11668/2019; High Court of Delhi; Justice Manoj Jain; decided 06.03.2025; DDA flat conversion; liberty to file fresh representation; DDA to decide within six weeks; petition disposed of; rights and contentions reserved; no merits adjudicated; no statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation to the DDA seeking conversion of the flat within one week; the DDA to consider such representation afresh and decide it as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six weeks of receipt; all rights and contentions of the parties reserved with no observation on the merits. ¶¶17

Satya Gujral Vs Delhi Development Authority — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~22

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 11668/2019

¶4

SATYA GUJRAL

¶5

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Mehta with Ms. Shweta Soni and Mr. Akanksha Singh, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

¶8

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Shahna Farah with Ms. Sanna, Advocates.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶11

O R D E R % 06.03.2025

¶12

After hearing arguments at length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation to DDA seeking conversion of flat in question. She submits that the DDA may also be requested to decide such representation in a time-bound manner. It is also submitted that, in case, she is aggrieved by the decision on her such representation, she would rather approach a Civil Court for seeking appropriate relief. It is thus prayed that the present petition may be disposed of in aforesaid terms.

¶13

Learned counsel for respondent, without prejudice to their rights and contentions, submits that it would consider any such representation afresh and would decide the same in accordance with law.

¶14

W.P.(C) 11668/2019 1

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2025 at 12:26:18

¶16

Petitioner is granted one week’s time to file any such representation and in case, any such representation is filed, DDA shall decide the same as expeditiously as possible and, preferably, within a period of six weeks from the day of its receipt.

¶17

Present petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.

¶18

It is, however, clarified that all the rights and contentions of parties are reserved and this Court has not given any observation with respect to the contentions raised by either of the sides.

¶19

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶20

MARCH 6, 2025 /sw/SS

¶21

W.P.(C) 11668/2019 2

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2025 at 12:26:18

Satya Gujral v. Delhi Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satya Gujral v. Delhi Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Singh Vs Delhi Transport Corporation

Kusum Healthcare Private Limited Vs the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13(1), New Delhi & Ors.

Aarone Developers Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1) New Delhi & Ors.

Dr. Jatinder Bali Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Deepshikha Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs Goods and Service Tax Officer Ward - 92 & Anr.

Ganesh Trading Company Vs Superintendent Range 27 Central GST Division New Delhi & Anr.

Mr. Rohit Hans and Anr. Vs Directorate General of Civil Aviation and Anr.

Smita Jindal Vs Commissioner of Cental Goods and Service Tax (Cgst), Delhi West

Dharampal Vs Delhi Development Authority through Its Chairman & Anr.

Vineet Goswami Vs Delhi Development Authority

Smt. Kamlesh Devi Vs D. D. a. and Anr.

Dr. Arun Sharma Vs Pooja Sharma

M/S Vardhman Fashion Mall (Lsc) Owners Welfare Association Vs Delhi Development Authority and Anr.

Ram Chander Lamba Vs Vijay Kumar Dev & Anr.