Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition after partial hearing, to refile with fuller particulars including details of other legal proceedings involving the petitioner. Court granted liberty to file afresh and disposed of pending applications.
Liberty to withdraw the petition and file afresh with additional particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~89
IMRANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jeyam, Ms. Sakshi Kumari and Mr. Saurav Singh, Advocates.
versus
THE SPECIAL SECRETARY (HOME- FSL) & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Advocate (appearance not given).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 06.03.2025
SACHIN DATTA, J
MARCH 6, 2025/ r
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 12:10:59
Imrana
The Special Secretary (Home- FSL)
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
