Mention of bank account detail of plaintiff on invoices suggests that there was an agreement between plaintiff and defendant that payment was to be made to Bank of India branch located in Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi. So, the part cause of action arose in that area also which is in territorial jurisdiction of this court. In, Satyapal Vs Slick Auto Accessories Pvt. Ltd. & ors. (supra), Hon'ble Delhi High Court held that if no place of payment was specified, the principle of debtor must seek creditor shall apply and the recovery suit would be maintainable at the place where the creditor resides or works for gain because part cause of action can be said to have arisen at that place also. In the present case, the bank detail of the plaintiff is mentioned on and every invoice suggesting that the parties had agreed that the payment of the goods would be made by the defendant in that account. Hence, it can be said with certainty that part cause of action has arisen in the area of this court and due to that reason, this curt has territorial jurisdiction to decide the case. 9. DW-l admitted in cross-examination that the defendant does business from its office located at premises bearing no.4574/15, Padam Chand Marg, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, Delhi. He deposed that the orders are finalized and meetings are held with the parties and customers in that office. Next deposition is that the head office of the defendant is located in Daryaganj area. These answers prove that head office of the defendant is situated in Daryanaganj which is in the jurisdiction of this court. Part cause of arisen had arisen in the area of Jhandewalan where the Bank of India Branch of the plaintiff is situated. So, even with the help of Ultra Home Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Puroshottam Kumar Chaubey & ors. (supra) (relied by the defendant itself), this court has jurisdiction to decide the case.”
