Appellant sought to withdraw arbitration appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal under Section 37. High Court dismissed appeal as withdrawn with the stated liberty.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh appeal under Section 37.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~281
..... APPELLANT Through: Mr.Karanjot Singh Mainee, Mr.Sahil Chopra and Mr.Shishir Kaushik, Advocates. versus HIMANSHU SINGH & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTs Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU O R D E R % 28.02.2024 1. After some arguments, the learned counsel for appellant seeks to withdraw the above appeal with the liberty to file a fresh appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
FEBRUARY 28, 2024 M
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/03/2024 at 11:46:29
1 provisions across 1 enactments
OMAXE LTD
HIMANSHU SINGH & ANR.
Vibhu Bakhu
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A first appeal against a decree of a Commercial Court under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
